Tag Archives: same sex marriage

Splitting The Coalition: Fractured Facts On Blacks And Same-Sex Marriage

Black voters are not the problem here, folks.

“Blacks and Latinos killed same-sex marriage in California” is one of the nastiest lies out of 2008, and it’s been held against those groups by some in the left now for years.  It’s still being held against blacks in particular when it comes to President Obama’s “refusal” to fully embrace same-sex marriage as a right.  It’s one of the most egregious wedges being driven into the Obama coalition, and the mistruths surrounding that are still on display today, as National Journal’s Josh Kraushaar goes after the President’s “evolution” by saying “black voters won’t support him” is the reason he won’t come out for same-sex marriage.  This black voter disagrees.

Public opinion on gay marriage is pretty straightforward.  There’s a huge generational divide – with older voters solidly opposed, and younger voters solidly supportive.  Over time, support for gay marriage should increase.  And if Obama came out in support of gay marriage, he would probably excite and inspire many college-aged Democrats to show up at the polls and support him — not to mention winning back some socially-moderate independents who have been disenchanted with the president over the economy.

But college-aged voters are only part of the president’s coalition.  The bigger element consists of African-American voters, who are solidly opposed to gay marriage. California’s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage passed in 2008 thanks to overwhelming black support; 70 percent backed it, according to exit polls.  Recent gay marriage legislation in Maryland drew opposition from leading Democratic African-American legislators in the state.  The same ministers organizing get-out-the-vote efforts in black churches for Obama are also railing against gay marriage.
Continue reading

TumblrShare

Rick Santorum Declares Stopping Same-Sex Marriage is the Hill Upon Which He Will Die

In Other Breaking News, Water is STILL Wet

How can Rick Santorum be afraid of this?

I normally pay scant attention to Rick Santorum for a variety of reasons.  One, he has about as much chance as I do to be the next president, so I don’t see why I should waste too much energy on him.  Two, he’s an asshole.  Three, Google his name.  ’nuff said.  But, there’s a video of him that I’m having a hard time ignoring.  Crooks & Liars has a post about it that includes the video.  In the interview, he is asked what’s at his core, upon which hill will he die.  After spouting some generic crap about basic freedoms and government control of people’s lives – by the way, I always want to rusty pitchfork these asshats who spout off about governmental control or how much government sucks  as they are running for government, but that’s a different post for a different day – he’s goes on to say:

The battle we’re engaged in right now is same-sex marriage.   Ultimately, that is the very foundation of our country, the family, what the family structure is going to look like.”  [Santorum nods thoughtfully].  ”I’ll die on that hill.”

Hoooooo boy.  So many things wrong with that statement.  Where do I start?  First of all, one thing is clear about Rick – he’s a true believer.  Many politicians spout this shit because they know the base will eat it up.  Red meat, indeed.  Santorum, on the other hand, really does think gay marriage is the bane of all our ills.  Any question he is asked, it’s his first answer.  And, if the question has nothing to do with ‘traditional family values’, he finds a way to make it about traditional family values.  When I was watching the last debate, I was struck by how cavalier he was about the economy, jobs, etc.  He only really got animated when he was talking about traditional family values and how he would be the defender of said values.
(Click for more pearl-clutching by Santorum)

TumblrShare

Bye-Bye Weiner; Hello Nutbag: Same-Sex Marriage Effect on NY-9 Special Election [Updated!]

Bad news for Democrats.

The WeinerGate election takes place tomorrow and it is not looking good for Democrats.

Republican nutbags in Weiner’s district may pull off a reverse Hochul.  Why?  Because of Democrats’ failure to understand that the NY-9 race is very different from the NY-26 race, in which Kathy Hochul upset Jane Corwin by making the election a referendum on Medicare and Paul “Baby Blue Eyes” Ryan’s attempt to figuratively murder your grandma by turning Medicare into a voucher program.

Everybody loves Medicare.  Not everybody loves same-sex marriage, and the NY-9 race has become a referendum on same-sex marriage, as evidenced by Democratic State Senator Ruben Diaz’s robo-call efforts slamming Democratic candidate Weprin for his pro-same sex marriage stance:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Kitty Lambert and Cheryle Rudd: Gays in New York are Marrying Like Gay Rabbits

Heterosexual nutjobs place their sacred marriages in a lockbox and brace for deep impact

People are getting gay married in New York like you wouldn’t believe, and so far, the universe seems okay with it.

First up?  Kitty Lambert and her partner Cheryle Rudd, who have waited more than a decade for New York to recognize their relationship:

According to a press release from New Yorkers United for Marriage, the first same-sex couple to legally wed in New York State will be Buffalo residents Kitty Lambert and Cheryle Rudd, who will tie the knot on Luna Island in front of Niagara Falls. Also, “For the first time, to commemorate the wedding, monumental Niagara Falls will be lit in hues of the rainbow equality flag.”

The release notes that:

Kitty Lambert and Cheryle Rudd have waited over a decade for New York to recognize their relationship; and after five children and twelve grandchildren, these Buffalo residents do not want to wait one second longer. So, at exactly 12:00:01, one second after marriage equality becomes the law of their home state, Kitty and Cheryle will finally say, “I do,” in the presence of family, friends, local and statewide elected officials, national VIPs and thousands of well-wishers.

(Can you imagine how many couples have gotten married and divorced during the more than ten-year period that Cheryle and Kitty were waiting around for New York to get its shit together?  I’m not sure of the exact number, but I’m going with “lots.”)

Aaaaanyway, Kitty and Cheryle were married just after midnight today:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Greetings, Salon Readers!

Oh. Hi there. Thanks for stopping by.

I thought I would welcome those of you who might be first-time visitors.

I’m Allan. I’m an Angry Black Lady.

So this happened:

Gentlemen! There's no fighting in the War Room!

Natasha Lennard’s article included the following paragraphs:

“What u said was that Obama was against what happened in NY which is inherently dishonest. U made like he lobbied against the bill,” read one tweet; “why did you lie?” demanded another; and “@maddow has Hate and Racism towards Obama!” wrote another. The playwright and journalist J. Samuel Cook tweeted, I feel sorry for all the #LGBT Americans whose victory last night in New York is overshadowed by @maddow’s and @ltdanchoi’s hatred of Obama.”

Allan Brauer, a blogger at AngryBlackLady.com, wrote that Maddow was refusing to acknowledge a quote from a letter Obama wrote to an LGBT group in California in opposition of Prop. 8. “I want to congratulate all of you who have shown your love for each other by getting married these last few weeks,” Obama wrote in 2008. Others point to the fact that Obama’s view is “evolving” to illustrate that Maddow’s use of the word “against” did not do justice to the president’s view on marriage equality. [emphasis added]

And concluded:

Maddow may have been a bit too strong in her initial comments, but clearly she touched a fragile, irrational nerve in the body of Obama’s diehard supporters.

When ABL sought out the author for clarification, she acknowledged (via Twitter) that my comments were a “fair critique,” which suggests Lennard is differentiating my feedback from that emanating from the “fragile, irrational nerve in the body of Obama’s diehard supporters.” Hey, I’m a white male, so I’m accustomed to my opinions being given greater credence. But whatever. I don’t feel the need to slam other people for how they expressed their feedback to Rachel, even if I don’t agree with all of it.

I’ve had a few things to say since I joined the team here at ABLC, including some reflection on how people communicate via Twitter, and how some public figures are navigating this highly interactive, two-way medium more effectively than others.

But for now, a few thoughts in no particular order:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Pat Robertson: Marriage Equality in New York Will Lead to Angel Rape (or something)

Because sodomy came from Sodom… GET IT?

A hot stream of crazy spewed from Pat Robertson’s mouthhole — something about same sex marriage leading to angel rape, and the destruction of American civilization as we know it:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Marriage Equality in New York: The Empire State Building Has Teh Gay!

Taste the rainbow!

Way to go, New York!

6 (7 including D.C.) down, 44 to go!

Continue reading

TumblrShare

MN House Passes a Bill that Will Allow Minnesotans to Vote on LGBT Folks' Civil Rights in 2012: So Much for MN Nice

Minnesota Nice is dead.

::Pours one on the curb for Minnesota Nice::

It has always been more about appearances than actual substance, but tonight just killed even the myth of Minnesota Nice deader than a doornail.  I went to an amazing concert with Vienna Teng and Alex Wong, but I can’t even savor it because I came home and watched the last bit of the House debate on whether or not Minnesotans should get to vote on the civil rights of LGBT folk in the 2012 election.  I listened to John Kriesel*, REPUBLICAN, Cottage Grove, give an amazing testimony, urging his fellow Congresspeople to vote against the bill.  He said if he had a ‘hell NO’ button, he would press it.  Then, I listened to Steve Gottwalt, Republican, St. Cloud, who sponsored the bill and apparently the only supporter brave enough to actually speak in defense of the odious bill, and he was spouting respectful discussion and that it had been very hard for him to bring this issue forth.  Oh, and that he wasn’t talking about taking away civil rights, no no!  LGBT can’t marry in MN, anyway.  This just makes it, you know, permanent.  But, it’s not discrimination.  No.  It’s just important for the people of Minnesota to discuss it and vote on it and…he couldn’t give a straightforward answer on why this is so important.  He just felt it was bigger than the legislature or the courts.  Only the Minnesota people could decide.

He said he was confident people on both sides could be respectful in the debate.  Then, the bill to enshrine the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman in the MN constitution passed in the MN House, 70 – 62.  In 2012, Minnesotans get to vote on the civil rights of LGBT folk.

There is nothing respectful about intimating that anyone’s civil rights are up for vote.  There is nothing respectful about the cowards who voted for this bill not having the guts to stand up and defend it on the floor, save for Mr. Gottwalt as the very last speaker.  There is  nothing even remotely respectful in telling a bunch of people, “Hey, you know what?  You’re lesser than simply because I say so”, no matter how couched in religion and morality it may be.

The night Barack Obama was announced as the next President of the United States, I wept in pride, joy, and sheer relief.  Hours later, when I heard that Prop. 8 had passed in California to ban same-sex marriage, I wept again–this time in pain, sorrow, and sheer sadness.  It wasn’t supposed to happen in California.  If it could happen there–then it could happen anywhere.**
(Click for more of my disgust)

TumblrShare

Three Marriages

BREAKING NEWS:

Marriage equality rally

Eric Holder announces that President Obama has decided, and he concurs, that provisions of DOMA (the Defense of  Marriage Act, h/t George Orwell) are unconstitutional and the DOJ will stop defending DOMA in court!

What follows is a slightly revised version of a post I shared at Al Giordano’s website shortly after California voters approved Prop 8, which banned same-sex marriage just a few months after a court ordered the state to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. My partner Norberto and I were in line the morning of June 17, 2008, and were wed on the spot in a civil ceremony.

Three Marriages

On Saturday, November 15th, 2008, up to one million people rallied in over 300 cities and towns across the United States and overseas to advocate for one common cause: marriage equality for all.

This event was born only eight days earlier when two women, Amy Balliett and Willow Witte, started exchanging emails about the passage of California’s Proposition 8 and anti-gay initiatives in the states of Florida, Arizona and Arkansas. They created Join the Impact, and people flocked to their new website to network and publicize their own grassroots plans to rally. You can read more about Join the Impact in this great article from 365Gay.

I joined with the local LGBT rights organization Equality Action Now to help stage the Sacramento, CA demonstration. Many fine speakers, including local elected leaders, made the case for marriage equality. As they did, my mind wandered to consider the power of marriage, and three marriages in particular, to change the world.

Look back in time with me, then ahead to the future, to consider these three marriages.

Continue reading

TumblrShare