Tag Archives: Salon

Tim Wise on the Lunacy of Greenwald and the Progressive Pauliban

Nailed it.

I have one question for the Salon.com blogger who repeatedly states that he does not endorse Ron Paul, and who coyly demurs that his vociferous statements of Ron Paul’s sheer awesome are not endorsement but simply a wistful desire to see certain issues discussed during the campaign: Why the fuck isn’t he endorsing Ron Paul?

He obviously thinks that Ron Paul is the bee’s knees and that Obama is some sort of Muslim baby-killing, drone-happy dictator. There’s a reason the Salon.com blogger refers to Obama as “Dear Leader” and to Obama supporters (85 percent of Democrats, mind you) as cultists (as well as depraved individuals who would defend anything, including Obama raping a nun.) So if he is spending thousands upon thousands of words touting the “really important shit” that Ron Paul brings to the 2012 election while also writing screed after screed (after screed after screed) about all the ways in which President Obama is the worst, and how Obama is a centrist Republican whose fault it is that the current Republican candidates are in a state of sheer clusterfuckery, it seems to me that the Salon.com blogger should saddle up and endorse Ron Paul.

It’s getting ridiculous — really.  His non-endorsement endorsement nonsense is positively Clintonian: “It depends on what the definition of ‘endorsement’ is.” Render unto me a break. The Salon.com blogger is fooling no one but his rabid supporters and the feckless media which invites him to speak for progressives, even though he is about as progressive as Gary Johnson, which is not at all.  Oh, and don’t you dare mention the Salon.com blogger’s Cato Institute affiliation.  He’ll go berserk and deny it (even though, apparently, his ties to Koch/Cato are not as tenuous as he would have you believe.)***

But people are starting to get it. The Greenwald sweater of polemical deceit is unraveling, and I like it. I like it because I find his sort of polemical discourse and rhetorical bomb-throwing to be a reckless distraction from the serious problems that confront us.

I especially like this, from Tim Wise — “Of Broken Clocks, Presidential Candidates, and the Confusion of Certain White Liberals.”  It’s a thing of beauty. You should read the whole thing, but I’m going to excerpt what I see as the most salient bit: Continue reading

TumblrShare

Anatomy Of A Glenn Greenwald Smear Job!

I’m not a huge fan of Glenn Greenwald. There are many reasons why I dislike the man and his writings, but the main ones are his dishonesty and hyperbolic rhetoric. I only read him when I’m tipped off to something particularly crazy.

I’ll be honest and say that when he was assaulting the Bush administration, I was cheering him on. But even then, I noticed that Greenwald played loose with the facts and exaggerated things beyond recognition (Warning, right-wing link). So even though it was aimed at Bush, it still left a bad taste in my mouth. Lying and misleading is a Republican thing, but of course, anyone who knows about Greenwald, knows that he leans libertarian and doesn’t vote.

I was searching Google one day and came across an article in The Nation titled “A Response to Glenn Greenwald“, written by Mark Ames and Yasha Levine. Of course, I had to click on it. In recent years, Greenwald has become an example of how — with the growth of the internet — people have been given platforms who don’t deserve it and don’t have enough integrity to wield such power. Glenn Greenwald has shown time and time again that he is vicious in his attacks on people and uses every sleazy rhetorical technique known to humans to push his narrative. He is completely anti-Obama, anti-government and anti-Democratic Party. He used to be anti-Republican Party during the Bush years and that is when he established some false credibility with the left.

I did a study of his posts on Salon.com for a period of just over a month. What I found was — out of 43 posts, 38 of them were anti-Obama and the remaining 5 were about something non political. There were zero posts that attacked Republicans. ZERO! I guess the GOP hasn’t done anything recently that has upset Glenn.

If you want to experience the full impact of Glenn Greenwald’s hyperbole and over-the-top rhetoric, I suggest you read things in the order that I did. None of the articles are extremely long, with the exception of Glenn’s with his many updates, so it shouldn’t take that long. But you can certainly just keep reading here, too. Continue reading

TumblrShare

Glenn Greenwald: Slaying Make-Believe Villains

You know that 2006 incident when U.S. troops killed innocent Iraqi civilians?

You must have read about it. No, not that one, the other one. The one made public by U.S. soldier Bradley Manning, who stole state secrets and gave them to an Australian publisher? Yeah, that one.

Well, that was Obama’s fault.

And now it’s coming back to bite him in his immoral ass, because when you commit war crimes, the country that represents the victims of those war crimes won’t give your armies immunity anymore, and so you have to leave the country (not your own, just theirs). Hence President Obama’s recent announcement that the United States would complete a full withdrawal of the remaining 40,000 U.S. troops in Iraq by the end of 2011.

Salon.com emoblogger Glenn Greenwald has more:

Although this incident had been previously documented by the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the high-profile release of the cable by WikiLeaks generated substantial attention (and disgust) in Iraq, which made it politically unpalatable for the Iraqi government to grant the legal immunity the Obama adminstration was seeking. Indeed, it was widely reported at the time the cable was released that it made it much more difficult for Iraq to allow U.S. troops to remain beyond the deadline under any conditions.

In other words, whoever leaked that cable cast light on a heinous American war crime and, by doing so, likely played some significant role in thwarting an agreement between the Obama and Maliki governments to keep U.S. troops in Iraq and thus helped end this stage of the Iraq war.

“In other words,” Greenwald says, “Moreover…And in general…indeed” and “In sum,” the guy who “leaked those cables” – “whoever” that may be – “is responsible for one of the most consequential, beneficial and noble acts of this generation.”

I wouldn’t go so far as to define criminal behavior as noble, nor would I give such kudos to a man who gave away classified documents to a foreigner, but let’s talk about this “noble act.”

Continue reading

TumblrShare

The Joyless, Purposeless and Irrelevant Glenn Greenwald: Can't Celebrate Death, Won't Celebrate Life

Americans are a proud people.

We are accustomed to being No. 1, the envy of the world, an international superpower, a bastion of light, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

But in the last decade, and even in the last few years, we have watched our economy crumble, our social safety net unravel, our jobs go overseas, our income stagnate, our poverty rates rise and our assets become albatrosses.

In the wake of the Great Recession, America’s elected leaders have embraced the same austerity measures that the rest of the developed world has relied on as a solution to ballooning debts, bloated governments and stagnant economic growth.

Our future is uncertain, our middle class is shrinking, our schools and infrastructure are failing, and our hopes for a better tomorrow – our dreams of leaving our children a better life than we had – are dying.

The only remaining source of pride for the patriotic citizens of this once great, once prosperous nation, is her military might – her booming and still yet-to-be-defunded defense; the size and strength of her armies; the skill, bravery and selflessness of her service members, and the heroism of their actions.

And so we honor their successes, and we celebrate their greatness.

It is all that is left to remind us of our own greatness, as a society, as a nation, as Americans.

On May 1, when President Obama announced the capture and death of the mastermind behind 9/11 – the man who orchestrated the biggest breach of national sovereignty and who was responsible for the greatest mass murder on American soil since Pearl Harbor – America rejoiced.

“Let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11,” Obama said, “that we have never forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack on our shores. And tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11. I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people. The cause of securing our country is not complete. But tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind to. That is the story of our history, whether it’s the pursuit of prosperity for our people, or the struggle for equality for all our citizens; our commitment to stand up for our values abroad, and our sacrifices to make the world a safer place. Let us remember that we can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

While the citizens of this country danced in the street and gathered at the White House to celebrate justice and to honor the thousands of fellow Americans whose friends, co-workers, brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers, sons and daughters were killed on 9/11, there was one man, one citizen, who was busy writing a column for Salon.com about the travesty of bringing to justice a terrorist responsible for the deaths of more than 2,000 of his fellow citizens.

Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald was busy casting himself, somewhat prematurely, as a self-described “heretic” who didn’t buy into the “unadulterated ecstasy” and the “collective orgy of national pride” following Osama’s death, and who believed, conversely, that the masses were acting irrationally and unreasonably in a way Greenwald thought was appropriate to compare to “raucously cheering in a movie theater when the dastardly villain finally gets his due,” when in reality – or his understanding of reality – “the repercussions” of this moment were little more than political.

“(I)t’s going to be a huge boost to Obama’s re-election prospects and will be exploited for that end,” he wrote.

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Gene Lyons of Salon.com cavalierly dismisses racism and calls Melissa Harris-Perry a fool

Re-heally.

Yesterday, founder of Salon.com, David Talbot announced that, after six years,  he would be returning as CEO of the online magazine:

“In these increasingly hard times, Salon is dedicating itself to an American revival. Our editorial mission will become more explicitly and aggressively populist. We will be publishing more investigative pieces, exposing the shadow dance of power. And both Democratic and Republican targets will be fair game, since both parties are increasingly under the control of the same corporate forces.
~snip~
It’s time to start our own country.1

Today, Gene Lyons led the charge for Salon’s “new populism” by going all in against Professor Melissa Harris-Perry, and by extension, the scores of black people who agree with her [images of the Lyons article are below; links to Professor Harris Perry's article are here ("Black President, Double Standard: Why White Liberals Are Abandoning Obama") and here ("The Epistemology of Race Talk")]:

This just in: Not all the fools are Republicans. Recently, one Melissa Harris-Perry, a Tulane professor who moonlights on MSNBC political talk shows, wrote an article for the Nation titled “Black President, Double Standard: Why White Liberals Are Abandoning Obama.”

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Comment of the Week: "Race and Racism – Why Joan Walsh Doesn't Get It" – A Salon Commenter [Bonus ABL rant included]

Joan Walsh and David Sirota will *never* get it, and I am giving up.

 This week’s comment of the week comes not from this blog, but from Salon.com.  It was submitted in response to Joan Walsh’s meandering and defensive article on Melissa Harris-Perry’s suggestion that maybe — just maybe — race is a factor in the seemingly relentless (and often fact-deficient) criticism of President Obama.

Salon commenter Jcwtts1 writes:

Let me begin in the simplest way. Race and Racism are two different things. What happens in discourse, especially internet discourse, is that those two issues become conflated.

This is dangerous for both sides. On the one hand, you have the dismissive white response that is typical. “Just because I criticize the president doesn’t make me a racist.”

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Clueless About Race: John Aravosis

[This post is third in a series of four posts about the Melissa Harris Perry Kerfuffle.  The other posts can be read here, here, and here.]

Nobody asked you. Put your hand down.

I made the mistake of reading John Aravosis’ take on the furor induced by Melissa Harris-Perry’s articles in The Nation.  I don’t know why I bothered.

After all, John Aravosis rarely (if ever) has anything nice to say about Obama; never has a word of understanding to offer; and — on the day that black Americans watched in horror as President Obama “prove to the man” that yes, he is an American citizen born in this country, actually had the temerity to wonder why President Obama “took so long” to release his birth certificate. With that in mind, John Aravosis’ “good show, old girl” post in defense of Joan Walsh is unsurprising:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Clueless About Race: Joan Walsh

[This post is first in a series of four posts about the Melissa Harris Perry Kerfuffle.  The other posts can be read here, here, and here.]

Doe-eyed naiveté

As Zandar has already written here and here, Professor Melissa Harris-Perry set off a firestorm with her article in The Nation. In that article, Professor Harris-Perry argued what many black (and white) Americans believe to be true: that the disappointment felt by disaffected white liberals may be a result of their tendency to hold African-American leaders to a higher standard than their white counterparts (notice I said “may”):

The 2012 election may be a test of another form of electoral racism: the tendency of white liberals to hold African-American leaders to a higher standard than their white counterparts. If old-fashioned electoral racism is the absolute unwillingness to vote for a black candidate, then liberal electoral racism is the willingness to abandon a black candidate when he is just as competent as his white predecessors.

Professor Harris-Perry’s statement came as somewhat of a shock to white liberals (as gauged by the harsh response Professor Harris-Perry has garnered on Twitter and in the comment section of her post at The Nation), and it is interesting which white liberals have come out against Professor Harris-Perry’s article — almost as if they were positive Harris-Perry was talking about them.

I will address three of these liberals in separate and consecutive posts, and then end on a post which is solid advice that every liberal and/or progressive should heed.

First up?  Joan Walsh.

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Salon.com Is Desperate For Clicks, Don't Give Them Any!

Salon.com used to be one of my favorite websites. I would even promote it to my friends and family – back a few years ago. I was always a little annoyed by the ads I had to watch to get a day pass, but I tolerated it. I watched as the site gradually morphed from being anti-Bush to anti-Obama, in many ways they seem to have just replaced the names. I stopped reading them very soon after noticing this shift.

Well it has come full circle now and the main writers for the site are openly antagonizing Democrats and supporters of President Obama. Last night on Twitter, Joan Walsh and Glenn Greenwald both lobbed loaded tweets into the mix, apparently trying to goad some of us into a Twitter brawl. The funny thing is, the circle of folks I travel with on Twitter, for the most part, ignored them. We surmised that they were trying to increase attention and thus traffic for their failing site. Here is a tweet that clearly shows Ms. Walsh’s dislike for all of us who support our president…(emphasis mine)

Continue reading

TumblrShare