Tag Archives: Rachel Maddow

Remember When George H.W. Bush Supported Planned Parenthood and Family Planning?

Rachel Maddow had a great segment last night on how batshit crazy the Republican party has become over the last thirty years when it comes to reproductive rights and family planning.

Example Numero Uno? When Papa Bush was UN Ambassador, he sent a letter to the director of Planned Parenthood at the time, Alan Guttmacher, congratulating Planned Parenthood on the issuance of an eight cent “family planning” stamp, and stating he was “deeply appreciative of the dedication it symbolizes.”


Forty years later, George H.W. Bush has thrown his support behind Mitt “We’re gonna get rid of Planned Parenthood” Romney.
Continue reading

TumblrShare

Rachel Maddow Tells The Truth About Romney’s Lies

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Thank you Rachel Maddow for being honest with the American people.

TumblrShare

Attention, Male Talking Heads on My Teevee: Listen to Rachel, Please

When men can get pregnant, I’ll be interested in their opinions about birth control.

Any of y'all got a uterus? Didn't think so! STFU

My love affair with Rachel Maddow runs hot/cold. Precisely because she’s so smart and incisive, when she’s wrong it is more infuriating than when a dumber, less attentive pundit swings and misses yet again.

But all the elderly white men, most of them Catholics, who are hyping “Obama’s War on Catholicism” beyond any reasonable understanding of the actual American electorate, and the actual relationship between Catholics and their own leadership, need to have a seat and watch Rachel.

Yes, Chris Matthews, I’m looking at you. And you, Lawrence O’Donnell, and you, Mark Shields, and you, E.J. Dionne.

Pull up a chair. Comfy? Ready? OK, click play and learn.

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Gingrich Supporter Rick Tyler: Democrats Abort Black Babies [updated]

Madness.

Gingrich campaign strategist Rick Tyler opened his mouth last night and a whole lotta stupid fell out. The below clip demonstrates that Republicans really do live in an alternate reality where up is down, the sky is green, and asking a question about racism ipso facto makes you racist.

It’s surreal:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

As karoli over at Crooks & Liars put it:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Greetings, Salon Readers!

Oh. Hi there. Thanks for stopping by.

I thought I would welcome those of you who might be first-time visitors.

I’m Allan. I’m an Angry Black Lady.

So this happened:

Gentlemen! There's no fighting in the War Room!

Natasha Lennard’s article included the following paragraphs:

“What u said was that Obama was against what happened in NY which is inherently dishonest. U made like he lobbied against the bill,” read one tweet; “why did you lie?” demanded another; and “@maddow has Hate and Racism towards Obama!” wrote another. The playwright and journalist J. Samuel Cook tweeted, I feel sorry for all the #LGBT Americans whose victory last night in New York is overshadowed by @maddow’s and @ltdanchoi’s hatred of Obama.”

Allan Brauer, a blogger at AngryBlackLady.com, wrote that Maddow was refusing to acknowledge a quote from a letter Obama wrote to an LGBT group in California in opposition of Prop. 8. “I want to congratulate all of you who have shown your love for each other by getting married these last few weeks,” Obama wrote in 2008. Others point to the fact that Obama’s view is “evolving” to illustrate that Maddow’s use of the word “against” did not do justice to the president’s view on marriage equality. [emphasis added]

And concluded:

Maddow may have been a bit too strong in her initial comments, but clearly she touched a fragile, irrational nerve in the body of Obama’s diehard supporters.

When ABL sought out the author for clarification, she acknowledged (via Twitter) that my comments were a “fair critique,” which suggests Lennard is differentiating my feedback from that emanating from the “fragile, irrational nerve in the body of Obama’s diehard supporters.” Hey, I’m a white male, so I’m accustomed to my opinions being given greater credence. But whatever. I don’t feel the need to slam other people for how they expressed their feedback to Rachel, even if I don’t agree with all of it.

I’ve had a few things to say since I joined the team here at ABLC, including some reflection on how people communicate via Twitter, and how some public figures are navigating this highly interactive, two-way medium more effectively than others.

But for now, a few thoughts in no particular order:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

American wars and personal responsibility.

I went to my nearest VA Hospital today, to apply as a volunteer.

As luck would have it, I arrived just as the lady who does the fingerprinting had gone on break, so I wasn’t able to actually apply. But I’ve filled out my form. I have a plan.

I admit that I’m a bit perplexed by my decision (taken the day after bin Laden was killed, and the two are very much related) to do this. As a near-pacifist who regretfully but begrudgingly accepted the war in Afghanistan and was powerfully opposed to the war in Iraq, a person who encouraged her brother never to register for the draft, and would never want her own children to serve in the armed forces of any nation, it doesn’t exactly seem like a natural fit. There are a lot of places that could use my time and my skills: women’s shelters, the food pantry, literacy programs. Why not give my handful of hours to another, equally worthy effort? One without the stink of war about it?

I keep thinking (for years now, frankly) about all these young men and women who get sent off to battle. Who are sent off by my government. Who are sent off, this being a democracy, by me.

If my country is fighting two wars (and kinda-sorta a third) — don’t I have some responsibility for that? For the people who take up arms (whether I agree with the specifics or not) and who all too often come home wounded, in body or spirit? Surely the fact that I almost literally never see any of them — in my family, in my neighborhood, or on my TV — doesn’t matter. They’re out there: fighting wars that our nation decided to fight, with weapons paid for by my tax dollars, their hopes and dreams shaped or shattered by what happens on the field of battle, or they’re out there: back home, trying on their old life for the first time in years, trying to carry all that we’ve put on their shoulders. They’re my compatriots. They’re my brothers and sisters. In some cases, in most cases, they’re my kids.

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Jane Hamsher & Adam Green: Schadenfreude is Delicious and Gay

Obamabashbots

Watch this clip and ask yourself this: Do Jane Hamsher (@3:53) and Adam Green (@1:07) look like people who are attempting to foment progress and change?  Adam Green can’t stop bitching about how Obama never fights and uses the bully pulpit.  As for Jane, the disdain is practically oozing from her pores; and of course she makes sure to bash Obama at the end because that’s all she knows how to do.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Adam Green (of PCCC, the “progressive” group that is airing anti-Obama ads, one of which (as I wrote about here) is deplorably racist) may just be a dolt.  That ad aside, I get the sense that he just doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing and that he doesn’t know anything about how politics works.  I’m certainly no political strategist, but running anti-Obama ads?  Seriously?  What the hell is that going to accomplish? That’s no political strategy; it’s political strategery.

Jane, I believe, is equally clueless and uninformed, but she’s far more pernicious (as I discuss here and as Matt Osborne discusses here).  Several bloggers have been trying to figure out what her “progressive credentials” are.  Thus far, no one has come up with any answers (that I’ve seen).  One thing seems certain, Jane is in it for herself.

As Deaniac83 at  The People’s View points out, Hamsher seems more interested in criticizing President Obama than in doing anything of value. It makes no sense that she has a seat at the MSNBC table (or any table for that matter.)  She obviously doesn’t know anything.

I’m going to cut this short before I have an aneurysm.  I do have one more thing to say, however:

Continue reading

TumblrShare

Rachel Maddow Interviews Jon Stewart

My cup runneth over.

Watching it was like having multiple orgasms while eating bacon, drinking scotch, and talking about the glory that is the Oxford comma.

Watch it:

I’m sure I’ll think of something more eloquent than that, but I’m tired and this beer isn’t going to drink itself, y’know.  My quick thoughts, however, are as follows: People think that The Daily Show has far more influence than it actually does.  I love the show, and if you read my blog, I suspect you do too.  I went to the rally.  So did about 215,000 other people.  You probably did too–or at least, you watched it on television.  And you probably know all about the Conan, Stewart, Colbert-athon, and about Jon Stewart calling Tucker Carlson a dick, and about Colbert’s White House Correspondent’s Dinner speech.

I love that stuff.  I tend to get so caught up in it that I forget that not a lot of people really watch The Daily Show.  (Sorry Jon!) In fact, it isn’t the highest rated show on Comedy Central.  Do you know what is?  Tosh.0.1 Continue reading

TumblrShare

Fuckin' Midterms! How Do They Work?: The Lawrence O'Donnell/Glenn Greenwald Slapfight

We are all socialists now.

Somebody set us up the impeachment proceedings.As expected, Democratic losses last week led to certain Professional Asshats squealing with glee: “OMG OBAMA IS SO FAIL LOL.”

See! I told you so! Why didn’t you listen to meeeeeeee. I told you that everybody wants a public option or a pony or the right to [be gay, to not be gay, to be gay on Tuesdays, or to wear jean shorts and not be called gay]. Didn’t I say everyone should have a right to [insert issue].”

“And by the way!” –they just kept on talking and wouldn’t shut up, “I don’t want to brag, but I’m pretty sure I also told you that everybody wanted a bigger stimulus and nobody wanted any sort of stimulating if it wasn’t going to be the biggest hardest stimulus EVAR!”

Finally, on November 2 and 3, these asshats laughed and laughed and immediately joined together in one giant circle jerk to give each other the happy ending they’d been yearning for ever since Obama slapped that smirky public option off of the health care reform bill’s face with his giant pimp hand.

Knowing that my reaction to the post-election shenanigans would run the gamut of “oh kindly STFU” to “If you don’t STFU, I’m going to stab you in the neck with my pen,” I promised myself that after the election I was done: I was done reading comment fuckery, and I was done even attempting ironic responses to idiotic comments. (To understand why this is a big deal, you have to know me. I’m an argumentative person by nature. Just ask my friends. I will argue and argue until you concede simply because you want me to shut the hell up.) But I couldn’t. I didn’t have it in me.

For the past week, it’s been grand! I’ve stayed away from certain political websites. I stop myself from reading any comment sections (aside from Balloon Juice and occasionally, Wonkette). It doesn’t hurt that I’m too busy at work to cast vitriolic tweets into the Twitter vacuum at the asshats out there who think that they—and only they—hold the secret to whatever is going to usher in the greatest Progressive Revolution since the New Deal, the Great Society, Progressive Era, and the era of ubiquitous Progressive Insurance commercials combined.

Nevertheless, I winced as I saw certain bloggers claiming that the Republican Party—ZOMG! they are gonna take back the country and holy shitballs, the Democratz are going to be executed by fire squad and we’re all gonna have to wear hats with tea bagz on our headsz lol—took back the House because gay people were pissed about DADT. (I even saw a number being floated around—did you know that 76% of gay men voted for Republicans? [I’m not even going to look it up because to do so would be a colossal waste of my time, I suspect].)

My blood pressure rose when I saw pundits claiming that the Republicans had been given a mandate to kick Obama out of the White House and send him back to Muslimistan to live in exile for all eternity with his anti-colonial Kenyan father and his former Pastor Jeremiah Wright who will be screaming “GODDAMN AMERICA!” every hour on the hour.

My head ached when I saw blog posts definitively stating that the midterm election was a referendum on Obama and his inherent wussiness or Blue Doggedness, or his failure as Our Leader because he didn’t crap a public option into America’s Toilet.

And my head almost exploded upon reading that the Teatwits think they are the center now.

But none of it was anything that stirred up enough rage to warrant a blog post.

I just read an article, however, that is such a load of shit that it has quite figuratively bottled my mind.

The article details the kerfluffle between Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com and MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell. Greenwald and O’Donnell have been slap-fighting about Greenwald’s criticism of O’Donnell’s analysis during MSNBC’s election night coverage. Greenwald accused O’Donnell of blaming liberalism and liberals for the blowout. Lawrence responded that he had done no such thing. According to Greenwald:
Continue reading

TumblrShare