Overplanned Parenthood: Reproductive Tyranny

I’ve been circulating Amanda Ching’s short story ILU-486 like a madwoman. If you haven’t read it, you should do so (asiangrrlMN wrote about it here).  After reading it, if you have any doubts that the sort of dystopic existence described in the short story is eerily possible (if not imminent), check this out:

Nicolae Ceausescu loved nothing better than a monument to himself. But his ministerial palaces and avenues paled next to another of his schemes for building socialism: a plan to increase Romania’s population from 23 million to 30 million by the year 2000. He began his campaign in 1966 with a decree that virtually made pregnancy a state policy. “The fetus is the property of the entire society,” Ceausescu proclaimed. “Anyone who avoids having children is a deserter who abandons the laws of national continuity.”

It was one of the late dictator’s cruelest commands. At first Romania’s birthrate nearly doubled. But poor nutrition and inadequate prenatal care endangered many pregnant women. The country’s infant-mortality rate soard to 83 deaths in every 1,000 births (against a Western European average of less than 10 per thousand). About one in 10 babies was born underweight; newborns weighing 1,500 grams (3 pounds, 5 ounces) were classified as miscarriages and denied treatment. Unwanted survivors often ended up in orphanages. “The law only forbade abortion,” says Dr. Alexander Floran Anca of Bucharest. “It did nothing to promote life.”

Ceausescu made mockery of family planning. He forbade sex education. Books on human sexuality and reproduction were classified as “state secrets,” to be used only as medical textbooks. With contraception banned, Romanians had to smuggle in condoms and birth-control pills. Though strictly illegal, abortions remained a widespread birth-control measure of last resort. Nationwide, Western sources estimate, 60 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion or miscarriage.

The government’s enforcement techniques were as bad as the law. Women under the age of 45 were rounded up at their workplaces every one to three months and taken to clinics, where they were examined for signs of pregnancy, often in the presence of government agents – dubbed the “menstrual police” by some Romanians. A pregnant woman who failed to “produce” a baby at the proper time could expect to be summoned for questioning. Women who miscarried were suspected of arranging an abortion. Some doctors resorted for forging statistics. “If a child died in our district, we lost 10 to 25 percent of our salary,” says Dr. Geta Stanescu of Bucharest. “But it wasn’t our fault: we had no medicine or milk, and the families were poor.”

Abortion was legal in some cases: if a woman was over 40, if she already had four children, if her life was in danger – or, in practice, if she had Communist Party connections. Otherwise, illegal abortions cost from two to four months’ wages. If something went wrong, the legal consequences were enough to deter many women from seeking timely medical help. “Usually women were so terrified to come to the hospital that by the time we saw them it was too late,” says Dr. Anca. “Often they died at home.” No one knows how many women died from these back-alley abortions.

“Celibacy tax”: A woman didn’t have to be pregnant to come under scrutiny. In 1986 members of the Communist youth group were sent to quiz citizens about their sex lives. “How often do you have sexual intercourse?” the questionnaire read. “Why have you failed to conceive?” Women who did not have children, even if they could not, paid a “celibacy tax” of up to 10 percent of their monthly salaries.

The rebels who overthrew Ceausescu last month quickly rescinded the policy. “I would have killed Ceausescu for that law alone,” says Maria Dulce from her bed at Bucharest’s Municipal Hospital. The 29-year-old mother of two is recovering from a self-induced abortion. Here eyes are bruised with fatigue. She is among a half dozen women in the dingy hospital room. Dulce says she terminated her pregnancy because of the trauma associated with caring for her second child, an 18-month-old boy. “We had to buy milk on the black market,” she says, “and we had to buy a heater just for the baby’s room.” She had to have an emergency hysterectomy only days before the uprising. “Now that it’s possible for a woman to be a woman again I’m mutilated,” Dulce says through tears. “And now there is a reason to have a child in this country.”

from Karen Breslau, “Overplanned Parenthood: Ceausescu’s cruel law”, Newsweek, Jan. 22, 1990, p. 35.

Republicans are attempting to criminalize abortion, to criminalize miscarriages, and to strip women of the right to control what goes in and comes out of their bodies. If you’re not scared, you’re not paying attention.

This is why we fight. This is why we vote. This is why both parties are not the same.

(h/t YoohooCthulhu)

(image via)

TumblrShare

7 Responses to Overplanned Parenthood: Reproductive Tyranny

  1. More chilling information and any time we think “That can’t happen here” just listen to the words of the goatfiggers and read the laws they propose. And then look at China where things have gone the other way & forced birth control caused women to abort children, especially females to the extent that now China has an imbalance in their male/female population.

    Anytime the government wants to crawl up your vagina that is really when GOVERNMENT IS TOO BIG!!!

    That’s all I have to add here.

    • you’re so right in pointing out both sides of the spectrum of govt intervention with woman’s reproductive rights. ultimately, i see the issue (here in the US at least) moving from “pro life/pro choice” to a more nuanced debate over “woman’s rights/religion in politics” which will be harder for the right to defend from factual evidence and constitutional law. i think the discussion is on the right track, as ugly and dire as the whole situation is, and women are beginning to see the possible reality of these far right policies and the direct effect they will have on everyone’s lives.

      • Nailed that! I was at a coffee hour of Women for Obama this AM where a lot of this was discussed.

        Consensus: Vote as if your life and that of your children depends on it and GOTV for President Obama & Democrats!!!

        • i never in a million years would have thought that women’s reproductive rights would be the one thing to get me politically involved, but that’s exactly where i am today. progressive men have to be involved in the conversation, otherwise we are further worsening the situation with our silence.

          i’ve been calling the women in my life back on the mainland, and none of them seems to know about this stuff. its crazy, because their focus is only on the economy, to which i say “everyone chill the fuck out” obama’s got this. the rhetoric is overwhelming from the right, facts are nowhere to be seen. women’s rights at the state level are being eroded sooo quickly its frightening, yet no one seems to be noticing until just recently, myself included.

          “Vote as if your life and that of your children depends on it and GOTV for President Obama & Democrats!!!” to this i say – amen aquagranny!

  2. Republicans aren’t just attempting to criminalize miscarriage: that Utah bill became law two years ago minus the “reckless” clause. So miscarriage, if caused intentionally, is homicide.

    • XMLicious. Pure. Rage. The first big step to a nightmare society like the one ABL recounted. This shit IS happening here, damn it.

      ABL, I got so pissed reading this post, which is exactly why everyone needs to read it. This is happening in our country. If the Republicans have their way, this is what America would look like. Fuck them with my very rusty pitchfork™.

  3. progressive men have to be involved in the conversation, otherwise we are further worsening the situation with our silence.

    indeed. yet i see purportedly progressive men telling women both explicitly and implicitly that women’s health isn’t the end-all-be-all because drone strikes in Pakistan and bombing muslim countries that’s why; because a republican president is going to give them the drones-free foreign policy that they crave.

    liberal men are just as willing to throw women under the bus as RWNJ men are, if it suits their purposes.

    a line in the sand has been drawn and that line is women’s health and reproductive freedom. either folks are willing to stand up for women, or they can piss off. full stop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free